history

The National Park Service isn’t glamorous, but some of the most American places we have run on very unglamorous things:

• Payroll
• Vault toilets
• Trail crews
• Historians
• Biologists
• Seasonal workers
• Maintenance shops

The person who answers a confused visitor’s question with a map in one hand and a pocket full of patience.

That matters, because when people say the Trump administration is trying to defund the National Park Service, they’re not usually talking about a mustache twirling supervillain. They’re talking about a long, bureaucratic squeeze:

• Hiring freezes
• Attrition
• Proposed budget cuts
• Directives to shrink the federal workforce

It’s all snore-inducing, CSPAN drone until the visitor center door is locked, the trail bridge stays busted, and the interpretive program quietly disappears from the schedule.

The Squeeze Already Started

On January 20, 2025, President Trump ordered a government-wide civilian hiring freeze.

In April 2025, he extended it through July 15.

Then, in February 2025, he ordered agencies to hire no more than one employee for every four who leave, while also preparing for large-scale reductions in force.

A follow-up OMB and OPM memo told agencies to pursue a significant reduction in full-time positions and a reduced budget topline. The Park Service’s own website later warned visitors that operating hours and programming could change because of staffing adjustments.

That’s not rumor, it’s the paper trail.

What Would You Say You Do Here, National Park Service?

A lot of people hear “national parks” and picture Yellowstone, Yosemite, and maybe a bison blocking traffic.

The real thing is much larger and much more interesting. The National Park Service manages 433 units covering more than 85 million acres across all 50 states and several territories. That includes national parks, monuments, battlefields, historic sites, seashores, recreation areas, rivers, trails, and more. Its governing mission, written into the 1916 Organic Act, is to conserve scenery, wildlife, and natural and historic objects while providing for public enjoyment in a way that leaves them unimpaired for future generations.

That last sentence is heavy like a Chevy.

The Job is Bigger Than a Postcard

In the budget documents themselves, Park Service operations are broken into:

• Resource stewardship
• Visitor services
• Park protection
• Facility operations and maintenance
• Park support

In plain English, that means scientists, archivists, law enforcement rangers, fee staff, trail crews, custodians, mechanics, planners, historians, and the people trying to keep a century-old stone staircase, a Civil War battlefield, and a backcountry wastewater system all functioning in the same week.

The agency also works with communities around the country through programs tied to historic preservation, the National Register of Historic Places, National Historic Landmarks, trails, rivers, and close-to-home recreation. So, when the budget knife comes out, it’s not aimed at only the biggest parks out west.

It’s Not Just Smokey the Bear Getting Smoked

The economic stakes are real.

In 2024, the National Park System recorded 331.9 million recreation visits.

Those visitors spent an estimated $29.0 billion in gateway regions, supporting 340,100 jobs and $56.3 billion in national economic output. That’s hotel housekeeping in Moab. That’s a diner near Shenandoah. The gas station outside Acadia. The mechanic, the guide, the grocery store, the coffee shop, and a whole pile of towns that are not interested in becoming collateral damage in somebody’s ideological war on public institutions, crony capitalism, and personal enrichment.

Follow the Money: Why the National Park Service is Getting Cut

The Trump administration’s FY 2026 budget request proposed cutting the Park Service’s core Operation of the National Park System account from about $2.894 billion to $1.994 billion.

It also proposed dropping National Recreation and Preservation from about $89.6 million to $12.0 million, the Historic Preservation Fund from about $168.9 million to $11.0 million, and Construction from about $172.3 million to $99.5 million. Those aren’t trimming the fat, they’re feeding the NPS to the chipper-shredder.

The Newest Numbers are Harsher for the National Park Service

In the White House’s FY 2027 budget materials released in April 2026, the administration proposed cutting the Park Service’s operations account from an estimated $2.9 billion in 2026 to $2.143 billion in 2027.

The same documents show National Recreation and Preservation falling from $92 million to $6 million, and the Historic Preservation Fund falling from $181 million to $11 million.

The employment tables project direct civilian full-time equivalent staffing dropping from 11,488 in 2026 to 8,984 in 2027. Congress still has to act on those requests, but the administration’s direction of travel is not exactly subtle.

There’s one thing worth pointing out, because honesty matters more than a tidy villain speech: The administration’s 2026 budget also proposed reauthorizing the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund for another five years. That fund, created by the Great American Outdoors Act, is aimed at deferred maintenance.

So, the story is not that every single park-related line item moved in the same direction. It’s stranger than that. The administration proposed keeping a major maintenance tool alive while also proposing deep cuts to day-to-day operations, preservation programs, and staffing. A park can get a repaired road and still lose the people who interpret the trail, clean the campground restroom, catalog the archive, or keep the visitor center open six days a week instead of four. Infrastructure matters. So do caretakers.

Stripping the Copper from the Walls

Outside the Park Service fence line, the broader public-lands fight is already leaning on the same philosophy.

In March 2025, Interior and HUD announced a joint task force to identify federal land suitable for housing development and streamline land transfers.

In June 2025, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee released a proposal for mandatory disposal of a slice of BLM and Forest Service land for housing, calling it central to “President Trump’s housing and public lands agenda.”

National parks were excluded from that particular proposal, but the instinct is still revealing: Public land is being discussed as inventory to liquidate, rearrange, or “unlock” first, and as shared inheritance second. That is a fight with consequences far beyond any entrance gate.

That’s why this matters.

National Park Service: A Service for All of Us

The National Park Service is not a luxury line in a federal spreadsheet. It’s one of the few institutions in American life that still tries to hold beauty, history, grief, science, leisure, and public access in the same pair of hands.

It manages battlefields where the country tore itself open. It manages shorelines, deserts, trails, ancient dwellings, memorials, and odd little places that would never survive a strict profit-and-loss test. The National Park Service keeps a piece of the national memory from being paved, privatized, or forgotten.

So yes, we need to talk about the National Park Service.

We need to talk about what it does, what it costs, and what gets lost when an administration decides public goods are soft targets.

In the next posts, I want to get more specific. The budget fight. The push to dispose of public land. The founding story. The famous parks everybody knows and the quieter sites they don’t. Because, if you’re going to defend something, you should know what it is before the auctioneer starts clearing his throat.

---

Become Part of the Trail Crew

---

Lurk the Social Feed